LOSE WEIGHT WITH MEDICAL SUPPORT — BUILT FOR MEN
- Your personalised programme is built around medical care, not willpower.
- No generic diets. No guesswork.
- Just science-backed results and expert support.
Find out if you’re eligible

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) represents the calories your body burns maintaining essential functions like breathing, circulation, and cellular processes while at rest. Understanding how to find your resting metabolic rate provides the foundation for evidence-based weight management and nutritional planning. RMR accounts for 60–75% of your total daily energy expenditure, making it the largest component of caloric needs. Healthcare providers use RMR measurements to develop individualized dietary recommendations, particularly for patients with obesity, metabolic disorders, or those recovering from illness. Accurate RMR assessment helps establish realistic caloric targets that support health goals without compromising metabolic function or lean body mass.
Quick Answer: You can find your resting metabolic rate through indirect calorimetry testing at healthcare facilities or by using validated prediction equations like Mifflin-St Jeor that calculate RMR from your weight, height, age, and sex.
Resting metabolic rate (RMR) represents the number of calories your body requires to maintain basic physiological functions while at rest. These essential functions include breathing, circulation, cellular production, nutrient processing, and protein synthesis. RMR accounts for approximately 60–75% of total daily energy expenditure in most individuals, making it the largest component of caloric needs.
Understanding your RMR provides a foundation for evidence-based nutritional planning and weight management strategies. Healthcare providers use RMR measurements to develop individualized dietary recommendations, particularly for patients with obesity, metabolic disorders, or those recovering from illness. The measurement helps establish realistic caloric targets that support health goals without compromising metabolic function or lean body mass.
RMR differs slightly from basal metabolic rate (BMR), though the terms are often used interchangeably in clinical practice. BMR requires more stringent measurement conditions—including overnight fasting and complete rest—while RMR can be measured under less restrictive circumstances. For practical purposes, RMR typically measures 5–10% higher than BMR due to less rigorous testing protocols.
Accurate RMR assessment becomes particularly important in clinical populations. Patients with thyroid disorders, diabetes, or those undergoing significant weight changes may experience alterations in metabolic rate that affect treatment outcomes. Additionally, understanding RMR helps identify metabolic adaptation—a phenomenon where the body reduces energy expenditure in response to caloric restriction, which can complicate long-term weight management efforts.
If you experience unexplained weight changes (more than 5% of body weight over 6–12 months), persistent fatigue, unusual sensitivity to heat or cold, or changes in heart rate, consult your healthcare provider. These symptoms may indicate underlying conditions affecting your metabolism that require medical evaluation.
Indirect calorimetry represents the gold standard for measuring RMR in clinical and research settings. This method uses specialized equipment to analyze oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production during rest. The metabolic cart or handheld device calculates energy expenditure based on gas exchange, providing accurate real-time measurements. Validated devices typically show 2–5% coefficient of variation under standardized protocols, though accuracy varies by equipment type and testing conditions.
Testing typically requires 20–30 minutes in a quiet, temperature-controlled environment after an overnight fast (8–12 hours) and 24 hours without vigorous exercise. Additional preparation includes avoiding caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol for 4–12 hours before testing and postponing measurement during acute illness. The procedure involves breathing through a mouthpiece or ventilated hood while remaining still and awake.
Healthcare facilities, university research centers, and some fitness centers offer indirect calorimetry testing. Costs typically range from $75–200, and insurance coverage varies significantly. Many US health plans do not cover outpatient RMR testing unless medically necessary for specific conditions. Patients should verify coverage and potential need for preauthorization before scheduling.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices, while primarily designed to estimate body composition, increasingly incorporate RMR prediction algorithms. These devices send a low-level electrical current through the body and measure resistance to estimate lean body mass, which correlates with metabolic rate. BIA-derived RMR estimates can vary significantly between devices and may differ by 10–15% from indirect calorimetry measurements. Hydration status, recent exercise, and certain medical conditions can further affect accuracy, making BIA less suitable when precise RMR determination is needed.
Metabolic testing facilities at hospitals, sports medicine clinics, and registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) offices provide professional RMR assessment services. Before scheduling testing, patients should inquire about preparation requirements, including fasting duration, medication instructions, and activity limitations. Proper preparation ensures measurement validity and clinical utility for subsequent nutritional planning.
Several validated prediction equations estimate RMR using readily available anthropometric data. The Mifflin-St Jeor equation, developed in 1990 and supported by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Library for its performance across populations, demonstrates superior accuracy compared to older formulas. For men: RMR = (10 × weight in kg) + (6.25 × height in cm) – (5 × age in years) + 5. For women: RMR = (10 × weight in kg) + (6.25 × height in cm) – (5 × age in years) – 161.
The Harris-Benedict equation, originally published in 1919 and revised in 1984, remains widely used despite slightly lower accuracy than Mifflin-St Jeor. The revised formulas are: Men: RMR = 88.362 + (13.397 × weight in kg) + (4.799 × height in cm) – (5.677 × age in years). Women: RMR = 447.593 + (9.247 × weight in kg) + (3.098 × height in cm) – (4.330 × age in years). Both equations provide estimates within 10% of measured values for many individuals, though accuracy varies across populations.
For patients with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), standard equations may overestimate RMR due to the lower metabolic activity of adipose tissue compared to lean mass. The Mifflin-St Jeor equation generally performs better in this population, though individual variation remains substantial. Using actual body weight rather than adjusted weight calculations is typically recommended unless specific validated equations are available.
Important limitations apply to all prediction equations. They provide population-based estimates and cannot account for individual metabolic variations, medical conditions, medications, or metabolic adaptation from previous dieting. Equations typically show accuracy within ±10–15% for healthy adults but may demonstrate larger errors in elderly individuals, athletes, or those with metabolic disorders. When precise measurements are clinically necessary—such as for severe obesity management or metabolic disease—direct measurement via indirect calorimetry is preferable to equation-based estimates.
Body composition represents the most significant determinant of RMR variation between individuals. Lean body mass—including skeletal muscle, organs, and bone—demonstrates substantially higher metabolic activity than adipose tissue. Metabolically active tissues require more energy at rest, which explains why individuals with greater muscle mass typically exhibit higher RMR values, even when total body weight is comparable.
Age-related metabolic decline occurs progressively throughout adulthood, with RMR decreasing approximately 1–2% per decade after age 20. This reduction primarily reflects loss of lean body mass (sarcopenia) and changes in organ metabolic activity rather than aging per se. Maintaining muscle mass through resistance training and adequate protein intake can partially offset age-related metabolic decline, though some reduction appears inevitable.
Sex differences in RMR are substantial, with men typically demonstrating 5–10% higher metabolic rates than women of similar age and weight. This difference primarily reflects greater lean body mass and lower body fat percentage in men. However, when RMR is expressed per kilogram of lean body mass, sex differences diminish considerably, suggesting body composition rather than inherent metabolic differences explains most variation.
Thyroid function critically regulates metabolic rate through thyroid hormone production. Hypothyroidism can reduce RMR, while hyperthyroidism can increase it. The magnitude varies by individual and severity of the condition. Patients with diagnosed thyroid disorders require appropriate hormone replacement or suppression therapy to normalize metabolic function. Other endocrine conditions—including Cushing's syndrome, growth hormone deficiency, and polycystic ovary syndrome—also affect RMR.
Medications can influence metabolic rate. Some medications, including certain beta-blockers, may reduce energy expenditure, while some psychiatric medications may affect both metabolism and appetite. Conversely, stimulant medications and some thyroid preparations may increase energy expenditure. Patients experiencing unexplained weight changes should discuss potential medication effects with their healthcare provider.
Caloric restriction and metabolic adaptation represent important considerations for weight management. Prolonged caloric deficits can trigger adaptive thermogenesis—a protective mechanism where the body reduces RMR beyond what would be predicted by weight loss alone. This adaptation can complicate weight loss maintenance. The phenomenon appears partially reversible with refeeding, though some metabolic suppression may persist in individuals with significant weight loss history.
Once RMR is determined, calculating total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) requires accounting for physical activity and the thermic effect of food. The activity multiplier method applies factors ranging from 1.2 (sedentary) to 1.9 (very active) to RMR. For example, an individual with an RMR of 1,500 calories who exercises moderately 3–5 days weekly would multiply by 1.55, yielding a TDEE of approximately 2,325 calories. This represents the maintenance caloric intake—the amount needed to maintain current weight.
Weight loss planning using RMR data should follow evidence-based guidelines. The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and The Obesity Society recommend creating a caloric deficit of 500–750 calories daily to achieve 1–1.5 pounds of weekly weight loss. However, caloric intake should not fall below 1,200 calories daily for women or 1,500 calories for men without medical supervision, as very low-calorie diets risk nutritional deficiencies and excessive lean mass loss.
For sustainable weight management, healthcare providers increasingly recommend smaller deficits (300–500 calories daily) combined with resistance training to preserve lean body mass. This approach produces slower but more maintainable weight loss with less metabolic adaptation. Patients should be counseled that weight loss is rarely linear—weekly fluctuations due to fluid retention, hormonal changes, and dietary sodium are normal and do not indicate treatment failure.
Clinical monitoring becomes essential when using RMR for therapeutic interventions. Patients should be evaluated for signs of excessive caloric restriction, including fatigue, cold intolerance, hair loss, menstrual irregularities, or mood changes. These symptoms may indicate metabolic suppression or nutritional inadequacy requiring intervention. Periodic reassessment of energy needs during active weight loss helps adjust caloric targets as body composition changes.
Special populations require modified approaches. Older adults should prioritize protein intake (1.0–1.2 g/kg daily or higher with medical approval) and resistance exercise to minimize age-related muscle loss during caloric restriction. Patients with kidney disease need individualized protein recommendations. Those with diabetes need coordinated adjustments in diabetes medications as caloric intake changes to prevent hypoglycemia. Pregnant or lactating women and adolescents should not restrict calories without medical supervision. Individuals with eating disorder history should work exclusively with specialized treatment teams.
Patients should be advised that RMR represents only one component of comprehensive health management. Nutritional quality, physical activity, sleep, stress management, and medical condition management all contribute to metabolic health beyond simple caloric mathematics. Referral to registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) is appropriate when patients require individualized meal planning, have complex medical conditions, or struggle with independent dietary modification.
RMR (resting metabolic rate) can be measured under less restrictive conditions than BMR (basal metabolic rate), which requires overnight fasting and complete rest. RMR typically measures 5–10% higher than BMR due to less rigorous testing protocols, though both terms are often used interchangeably in clinical practice.
Validated prediction equations like Mifflin-St Jeor typically estimate RMR within 10–15% of measured values for healthy adults. However, accuracy varies in elderly individuals, athletes, or those with metabolic disorders, making direct measurement via indirect calorimetry preferable when precise measurements are clinically necessary.
Yes, certain medications can influence metabolic rate. Beta-blockers and some psychiatric medications may reduce energy expenditure, while stimulant medications and thyroid preparations may increase it. Patients experiencing unexplained weight changes should discuss potential medication effects with their healthcare provider.
All medical content on this blog is created using reputable, evidence-based sources and is regularly reviewed for accuracy and relevance. While we strive to keep our content current with the latest research and clinical guidelines, it is intended for general informational purposes only.
This content is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider with any medical questions or concerns. Use of this information is at your own risk, and we are not liable for any outcomes resulting from its use.